[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A168E0.3020305@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 21:44:00 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/memory-hotplug: fix lowmem count overflow when
offline pages
(5/25/13 9:23 PM), Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi KOSAKI,
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 09:16:24PM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> ---
>>> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> index 98cbdf6..23b921f 100644
>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> @@ -6140,6 +6140,8 @@ __offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>>> list_del(&page->lru);
>>> rmv_page_order(page);
>>> zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
>>> + if (PageHighMem(page))
>>> + totalhigh_pages -= 1 << order;
>>> for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++)
>>> SetPageReserved((page+i));
>>> pfn += (1 << order);
>>
>> memory hotplug don't support 32bit since it was born, at least, when the system has highmem.
>> Why can't we disable memory hotremove when 32bit at compile time?
>
> Here is logic memory remove instead of ACPI based memory remove. ;-)
I know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists