[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A1A707.9030506@colorfullife.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 08:09:11 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>, hhuang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc,sem: move restart loop to do_smart_update
Hi Rik,
On 05/20/2013 12:32 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> @@ -751,17 +744,19 @@ static int update_queue(struct sem_array *sma, int semnum, struct list_head *pt)
> static void do_smart_update(struct sem_array *sma, struct sembuf *sops, int nsops,
> int otime, struct list_head *pt)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, restart;
>
> + again:
> + restart = 0;
> if (sma->complex_count || sops == NULL) {
> - if (update_queue(sma, -1, pt))
> + if (update_queue(sma, -1, pt, &restart))
> otime = 1;
> }
I didn't notice it immediately, this is insufficient:
Complex operations may affect all semaphores in the array.
Thus it is not sufficient to scan the per-semaphore queues of the
semaphores that were touched by *sops, all must be scanned.
Perhaps something like:
> + if (update_queue(sma, -1, pt, &restart))
> + sops = NULL;
> otime = 1;
> }
(untested!)
Test case:
1: semop(<key>, {{1, -1, 0}, {2, 1, 0}}, 2 <unfinished ...>
2: semop(<key>, {{2, -1, 0}}, 1 <unfinished ...>
3: semop(<key>, {{1, 1, 0}}, 1) = 0
[3] is able to run, calls do_smart_update().
The global queue is scanned and [1] is released
Without the "sops = NULL", [2] sleeps forever.
--
Manfred
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists