linux-kernel - Re: Basic perf PMU support for Haswell v10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 May 2013 15:01:17 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Basic perf PMU support for Haswell v10

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>>
>> > This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support,
>>
>> This series looks mostly good - I've got two requests:
>>
>>  - please rename intx -> in_tx, INTX -> IN_TX, as 'intx' is confusing
>>
>>  - please port to the latest tip:master (or perf/core), as the underlying
>>    code changed meanwhile, creating conflicts.
>
> Any update here? If not done this week then you'll possibly miss v3.10 as
> well.
>
Over a month and no update on this. This is becoming ridiculous.
This needs to go in for 3.10. Shall I do the rebase myself?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/