linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/14] misc/ep93xx_pwm: use {read,write}* instead of __raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201305271718.41851.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Mon, 27 May 2013 17:18:41 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>,
	mcrapet@...il.com, hsweeten@...ionengravers.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] misc/ep93xx_pwm: use {read,write}* instead of __raw_* versions for io

On Saturday 25 May 2013, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> @@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ struct ep93xx_pwm {
>  static inline void ep93xx_pwm_writel(struct ep93xx_pwm *pwm,
>                 unsigned int val, unsigned int off)
>  {
> -       __raw_writel(val, pwm->mmio_base + off);
> +       writel(val, pwm->mmio_base + off);
>  }

Just an idea: since you are adding the writel in a lot of places in subsequent
patches, you could rename 'mmio_base' to the shorter 'base' first, which would
make the resulting code actually smaller.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/