lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1305271849130.2372@math.ut.ee>
Date:	Mon, 27 May 2013 18:53:08 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: 3.10-rc3: WARNING: at kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c:578

> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:09:33PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > I enabled the new full dynctick on one of my test PCs - Intel 815 
> > 
> > Do you mean CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL? If so, it is not enabled in the .config
> > below.

Yes. I meant that - but obviously I did not enable it on this machine. I 
enabled it on every machine wehere this was offered for me by make 
oldconfig.

> > Also, there are a bunch of timers fixes from Thomas in tip - you could
> > try to merge tip/master ontop of -rc3 and retest.
> 
> All related fixes are already in Linus tree.

OK, will not check tip/master.

> That brilliant cpuidle stuff calls
> clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER) twice. So what happens is:
> 
> CPU0			CPU1
> 			cpuidle_idle_call()
> 			  clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER)
> 			    set cpu in tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask
>  broadcast interrupt
>   event expired for cpu1
>   set pending bit
> 			  acpi_idle_enter_simple()
> 			   clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER)
> 			   WARN_ON(pending bit)
> 
> So we need to move the WARN_ON into the section where we actually set
> the broadcast stuff up.

Are you sure? This is a UP machine.

Tested the patch - no effect, warning is still there :(

> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> index 24938d5..ec21dc0 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -575,8 +575,8 @@ void tick_broadcast_oneshot_control(unsigned long reason)
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
>  	if (reason == CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_pending_mask));
>  		if (!cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask)) {
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_pending_mask));
>  			clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN);
>  			/*
>  			 * We only reprogram the broadcast timer if we
> 

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ee)      http://www.cs.ut.ee/~mroos/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ