[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A3B9C7.7040300@colorfullife.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:53:43 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>, hhuang@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipc/sem.c: Fix missing wakeups in do_smart_update_queue()
Hi Rik,
On 05/27/2013 07:51 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Very much not optimized, but we need to fix the regression.
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Thanks for the review.
I was afraid that the differences would be noticeable but they aren't:
At least on my laptop, the differences between the patches are within
the noise:
# ./cat /proc/stat | grep ctxt;./osim 2 2 1000000 0 0;cat /proc/stat |
grep ctxt
runtime: stock patch 1 patch 1-4
2,0088875 2,041084 1,997367
# ./cat /proc/stat | grep ctxt;./osim 2 20 1000000 0 0;cat /proc/stat |
grep ctxt
4,32541 4,295956 4,277817
(assuming 2 cpus, otherwise increase "2" and "20" accordingly)
Here is the link to the tool:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125038376609750
--
Manfred
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists