linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clock changes for supporting CPUFreq on Exynos5250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51A442E4.90307@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 May 2013 11:08:44 +0530
From:	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
CC:	kgene.kim@...sung.com, mturquette@...aro.org,
	thomas.abraham@...aro.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clock changes for supporting CPUFreq on Exynos5250

On 05/17/2013 11:25 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
> With the use of common clock framework, CPUFreq driver on EXYNOS5250 now
> requires a few changes in clocks.
> 
> Tested on Exynos5250 based Arndale board.
> The patches are based on v3.10-rc1.
> 
> Tushar Behera (2):
>   clk: exynos5250: Update cpufreq related clocks for EXYNOS5250
>   clk: exynos5250: Add sclk_mpll to the parent list of mout_cpu clock
> 
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Any comments on this series?

-- 
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/