linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Drive quiescent-state-forcing delay from HZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130528100742.GA11088@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 May 2013 12:07:42 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Drive quiescent-state-forcing
 delay from HZ


* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:20:55AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > rcu: Fix comparison sense in rcu_needs_cpu()
> > > 
> > > Commit c0f4dfd4f (rcu: Make RCU_FAST_NO_HZ take advantage of numbered
> > > callbacks) introduced a bug that can result in excessively long grace
> > > periods.  This bug reverse the senes of the "if" statement checking
> > > for lazy callbacks, so that RCU takes a lazy approach when there are
> > > in fact non-lazy callbacks.  This can result in excessive boot, suspend,
> > > and resume times.
> > > 
> > > This commit therefore fixes the sense of this "if" statement.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > > Reported-by: Bj?rn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
> > > Reported-by: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > > index 170814d..6d939a6 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > > @@ -1667,7 +1667,7 @@ int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *dj)
> > >  	rdtp->last_accelerate = jiffies;
> > >  
> > >  	/* Request timer delay depending on laziness, and round. */
> > > -	if (rdtp->all_lazy) {
> > > +	if (!rdtp->all_lazy) {
> > >  		*dj = round_up(rcu_idle_gp_delay + jiffies,
> > >  			       rcu_idle_gp_delay) - jiffies;
> > 
> > Neat - could this explain sporadic long (but not infinite) boot times with 
> > NOHZ_FULL?
> > 
> > We changed HZ to be at least 1 Hz pretty recently, which might have worked 
> > around this bug.
> 
> Quite possibly...
> 
> Of course, I don't see the boot slowdowns in my testing.  :-/

They were pretty sporadic and only popped up (and down) during randconfig 
testing. Simple unrelated changes to the .config made them go away - 
heisenbugs.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/