[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A49FDC.2020608@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:15:24 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 3/5] tcp: add TCP support for low latency
receive poll.
On 28/05/2013 11:26, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> On 28/05/2013 03:36, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 10:44 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>>> #include <net/netdma.h>
>>> #include <net/secure_seq.h>
>>> #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>> +#include <net/ll_poll.h>
>>>
>>> #include <linux/inet.h>
>>> #include <linux/ipv6.h>
>>> @@ -2011,6 +2012,7 @@ process:
>>> if (sk_filter(sk, skb))
>>> goto discard_and_relse;
>>>
>>> + sk_mark_ll(sk, skb);
>>> skb->dev = NULL;
>>>
>>> bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
>>
>> How IPv6 is handled ?
It turns out that adding TCPv6/UDPv6 is very simple.
I will add them, with a warning that I only did very limited testing.
-Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists