lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 28 May 2013 14:05:02 +0100
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: map_init_section flushes incorrect pmd

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> This bug was introduced in commit e651eab0.
> Some v4/v5 platforms failed to boot due to this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index e0d8565..19a43f8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -620,6 +620,8 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>  			unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys,
>  			const struct mem_type *type)
>  {
> +	pmd_t *p = pmd;
> +
>  #ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
>  	/*
>  	 * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to
> @@ -638,7 +640,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>  		phys += SECTION_SIZE;
>  	} while (pmd++, addr += SECTION_SIZE, addr != end);
>  
> -	flush_pmd_entry(pmd);
> +	flush_pmd_entry(p);

Wait, shouldn't this flush be *inside* the loop anyway? Otherwise we just
flush the cacheline containing the first pmd. The flushing code could also
flush to PoU instead of PoC for UP ARMv7, but that's an unrelated optimisation.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ