[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130528001802.GB1359@amt.cnet>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:18:02 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gleb@...hat.com, avi.kivity@...il.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] KVM: MMU: zap pages in batch
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:20:12AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 05/25/2013 04:34 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:55:53AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> Zap at lease 10 pages before releasing mmu-lock to reduce the overload
> >> caused by requiring lock
> >>
> >> After the patch, kvm_zap_obsolete_pages can forward progress anyway,
> >> so update the comments
> >>
> >> [ It improves kernel building 0.6% ~ 1% ]
> >
> > Can you please describe the overload in more detail? Under what scenario
> > is kernel building improved?
>
> Yes.
>
> The scenario is we do kernel building, meanwhile, repeatedly read PCI rom
> every one second.
>
> [
> echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:03.0/rom
> cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:03.0/rom > /dev/null
> ]
Can't see why it reflects real world scenario (or a real world
scenario with same characteristics regarding kvm_mmu_zap_all vs faults)?
Point is, it would be good to understand why this change
is improving performance? What are these cases where breaking out of
kvm_mmu_zap_all due to either (need_resched || spin_needbreak) on zapped
< 10 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists