[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1305281418120.19080@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:22:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
trinity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOPS in perf_mmap_close()
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Vince Weaver wrote:
> It looks like this is already in tip, but I can confirm that this
> patch seems to fix things on my machine and holds up against longer
> fuzzing runs.
OK, I take it back. Even with the new patch applied, my fuzzer can still
make the kernel leak user->locked_vm
I assume that the locked_vm value should go back to 0 once a process that
has a bunch of mmap'd perf_events opened exits?
I admit this is sort of an obscure corner case, but it does mean that a
user can leak user->locked_vm to the point that "perf record" no longer
works.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists