[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A52257.4060905@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:32:07 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, atomlin@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pshelar@...ira.com, mst@...hat.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] skbuff: Hide GFP_ATOMIC page allocation failures for
dropped packets
On 05/28/2013 12:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:15 -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
>
>> The real problem seems to be that more and more the network stack (drivers, perhaps)
>> is relying on chunks of contiguous page-blocks without a fallback mechanism to
>> order-0 page allocations. When memory gets fragmented, these alloc failures
>> start to pop up more often and they scare ordinary sysadmins out of their paints.
>>
>
> Where do you see that ?
>
> I see exactly the opposite trend.
>
> We have less and less buggy drivers, and we want to catch last
> offenders.
These backtraces would still get printed out for drivers
that DO do the right thing and fall back to smaller
allocations.
The initial failed large allocation would cause a backtrace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists