[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130528220409.GD29338@dastard>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 08:04:09 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.10-rc3 xfs mount/recovery failure & ext fsck hang.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:41:37PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:32:48AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:15:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:10:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:12:30PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > > box crashed, and needed rebooting. On next bootup, when it found the dirty partition,
> > > > > xfs chose to spew and then hang instead of replaying the journal and mounting :(
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 14.694731] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, realtime, large block/inode numbers, debug enabled
> > > > > [ 14.722328] XFS (sda2): Mounting Filesystem
> > > > > [ 14.757801] XFS (sda2): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
> > > > > [ 14.782049] XFS: Assertion failed: fs_is_ok, file: fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.c, line: 169
> > > >
> > > > A directory block has an entry that is not in the hash index.
> > > > Either there's an underlying corruption on disk, or there's an
> > > > inconsistency in what has been logged and so an entire change has
> > > > not been replayed. Hence the post recovery verification has thrown a
> > > > corruption error....
> > > >
> > > > If you haven't already repaired the filesystem, can you send me a
> > > > metadump of the filesystem in question?
> > >
> > > Sorry, too late. If I can repro, I'll do so next time.
> > > FYI, I ran xfs_repair and it just hung. Wouldn't even answer ctrl-c.
> > > Rebooted, and then it mounted and recovered just fine!
> >
> > Strange. I can't think of any reason outside a kernel problem for
> > xfs_repair going into an uninterruptible sleep. Did it happen after
> > the repair completed (i.e. after phase 7)? If so, then closing the
> > block device might have tripped the same problem that fsck.ext2
> > hit....
>
> didn't even get that far. It opened the block dev, and then just sat there.
> I left it for a few minutes before deciding it was hung.
> And of course, this is an SSD, so there was no way I could tell if there
> was any IO going on by sound/feel/lights.
OK. Normally when it hangs you can kill it or ctrl-c out because it
gets stuck on a futex. You can then run xfs_repair -P to turn off
threading (and speed :() to avoid such hangs. but given that you
couldn't kill it, it doesn't sound like that sort of problem....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists