[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130528155326.0a8b66a7711746e827d5fdea@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:53:26 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: don't initialize kmem-cache destroying work for
root caches
On Tue, 14 May 2013 16:38:38 +0400 Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org> wrote:
> struct memcg_cache_params has a union. Different parts of this union are
> used for root and non-root caches. A part with destroying work is used only
> for non-root caches.
That union is a bit dangerous. Perhaps it would be better to do
something like
--- a/include/linux/slab.h~a
+++ a/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -337,15 +337,17 @@ static __always_inline int kmalloc_size(
struct memcg_cache_params {
bool is_root_cache;
union {
- struct kmem_cache *memcg_caches[0];
- struct {
+ struct memcg_root_cache {
+ struct kmem_cache *caches[0];
+ } memcg_root_cache;
+ struct memcg_child_cache {
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
struct list_head list;
struct kmem_cache *root_cache;
bool dead;
atomic_t nr_pages;
struct work_struct destroy;
- };
+ } memcg_child_cache;
};
};
And then adopt the convention of selecting either memcg_root_cache or
memcg_child_cache at the highest level then passing the more strongly
typed pointer to callees.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists