lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXr4S0P5P5JdegRyozSX4OCJ6+6MMybmAaMPCzfqe6yWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 May 2013 16:27:07 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, lkp@...ux.intel.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mm: fix boot hang regression

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Yuanhan Liu
<yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Firstly, your patch works and feel free to add:
>         Tested-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>

ok, will resend it in complete form.

>
> While, your patch fixes this issue on source side. I thought that
> before, too.  But I think it's better to fix it on root side.
> That's why I sent a patch to try to fix it at mapping stage; Meanwhile,
> I was trying to sent another patch to fix this issue on source
> side later. And you did that.
>
> On the other hand, since we support splitting PUD(and PMD), I guess we
> should make it do the right work just in case will meet such case later.

No, we should not split them.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ