linux-kernel - Re: System slow down from udev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1826731.cQudjZKeXZ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2013 01:57:03 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: System slow down from udev

On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 04:46:30 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 04:39:37 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> Raphael:
> >>
> >> Found one commit in your linus-pm cause user space very slow...
> >> at least from udev start...
> >
> > I obviously can't reproduce it, so it would be great if you could give me
> > more details.
> >
> > Is there anything unusual about your test system?
> 
> they are normal nehalem ex, westmere ex and ivybridge ex 8 sockets system.

Do all of them have the same problem?

What distro is running there?

Rafael


> >> bisect to
> >>
> >> ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc is the first bad commit
> >> commit ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc
> >> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >> Date:   Fri May 3 00:26:22 2013 +0200
> >>
> >>     ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure
> >>
> >>     Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is
> >>     non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration
> >>     and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the
> >>     existing processor driver functionality.
> >>
> >>     The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate
> >>     processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace
> >>     and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure.  It also
> >>     populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a
> >>     corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver
> >>     proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them
> >>     if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's
> >>     .attach() routine is running.
> >>
> >>     There are a few reasons to make this change.
> >>
> >>     First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI
> >>     hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably,
> >>     even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc.
> >>
> >>     Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices
> >>     before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort
> >>     (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors
> >>     if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of
> >>     continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove
> >>     is unset).  That is a more desirable behavior than what the current
> >>     code does.
> >>
> >>     Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver
> >>     proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine,
> >>     because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related
> >>     to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible
> >>     for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal
> >>     symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate).
> >>
> >>     Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the
> >>     'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's
> >>     directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead
> >>     and a corresponding 'firmware_node' is present in the processor
> >>     device's directory, the processor driver is now visible under
> >>     /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but
> >>     that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about
> >>     (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management).
> >>
> >>     Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500.
> >>
> >>     Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >>     Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >>     Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> >>
> >> :040000 040000 24925fd62fd97295be145d62f8d849004eeca284
> >> 30c7f7f9ff26f17eaabf1770eb7d0b69c2767ba8 M    drivers
> >> :040000 040000 8374b2dcd64a21abc1f65d3c7779ffa71adb01ba
> >> 9375e83719e970b6f4b9a61fe6080bd638dfc51c M    include
> > --
> > I speak only for myself.
> > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/