linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: Disable unused clocks after deferred probing is done

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130529075126.6058.58923@quantum>
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2013 00:51:26 -0700
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: Disable unused clocks after deferred probing is done

Quoting Saravana Kannan (2013-05-15 21:34:03)
> On 05/09/2013 11:35 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > With deferred probing, late_initcall() is too soon to declare a clock as
> > unused. Wait for deferred probing to finish before declaring a clock as
> > unused. Since deferred probing is done in late_initcall(), do the unused
> > check to late_initcall_sync.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/clk/clk.c |    2 +-
> >   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index fe4055f..5ecb64c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int clk_disable_unused(void)
> >
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> > -late_initcall(clk_disable_unused);
> > +late_initcall_sync(clk_disable_unused);
> >
> >   /***    helper functions   ***/
> 
> Mike,
> 
> Thoughts? Picking it up? Removing the existing auto-disable code (I 
> think they are still useful)?
> 

Hi Saravana,

I've taken this into clk-next for testing.

Regards,
Mike

> -Saravana
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/