[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51A610B802000078000D99A0@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:29:12 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: __force_order doesn't need to be an actual
variable
It being static causes over a dozen instances to be scattered across
the kernel image, with non of them ever being referenced in any way.
Making the variable extern without ever defining it works as well - all
we need is to have the compiler think the variable is being accessed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 3.10-rc3/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
+++ 3.10-rc3-x86-force-order/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static inline void native_clts(void)
* all loads stores around it, which can hurt performance. Solution is to
* use a variable and mimic reads and writes to it to enforce serialization
*/
-static unsigned long __force_order;
+extern unsigned long __force_order;
static inline unsigned long native_read_cr0(void)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists