[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A60A42.20905@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:01:38 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 2/5] net: implement support for low latency
socket polling
On 29/05/2013 16:37, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 09:39 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>> +static inline unsigned long ll_end_time(void)
>> +{
>> + return TSC_MHZ * ACCESS_ONCE(sysctl_net_ll_poll) + get_cycles();
>> +}
>
> This can overflow.
>
> Multiply is giving 32bits, as tsc_khz is an int, and sysctl_net_ll_poll
> is an int.
>
> unsigned long sysctl_net_ll_poll ?
OK
> Also, if we want this to work on i386, the correct type to use for
> ll_end_time(void) would be cycles_t
OK
I would be really surprised if someone uses this on an i386, but I guess
you never know.
Thanks!
-Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists