[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fvx5anqi.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 07:01:57 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@...com>
Cc: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] PM / AVS: SmartReflex: disable errgen before vpbound disable
Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@...com> writes:
[...]
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Bour <v-bour@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Affortunati <l-affortunati@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrii.Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@...com>
>> From Documentation/SubbmittingPatches:
>>
>> "If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling
>> of a patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then
>> they can arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's
>> changelog."
>>
>> Are all of the tags above co-authors or on the delivery path? I suspect
>> an Acked-by or Reviewed-by is more appropriate here.
[...]
> This patch was developed by Nishanth, he is the author of the code.
> Patch is the result of 2-week debug session. Vincent, Leonardo and
> Nishanth were involved to that debug session.
> My contribution to this patch - is sending it to upstream, no more
> than this.
> Could you please suggest - who should remain in Signed-offs ?
Nishanth as the author, and you since you're on the delivery path.
If Vincent & Leonardo should be considered as co-authors, then their
signoffs are fine, otherwise they should be reviewed-by or acked-by.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists