[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130529145312.GE3955@alap2.anarazel.de>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:53:12 +0200
From: Andres Freund <andres@...quadrant.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Stewart Smith <stewart@...mingspork.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: fincore()
On 2013-02-16 14:53:43 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:13:04 -0500
> > Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> >> I dunno. The byte vector might not be optimal but its worst cases
> >> seem more attractive, is just as extensible, and dead simple to use.
> >
> > But I think "which pages from this 4TB file are in core" will not be an
> > uncommon usage, and writing a gig of memory to find three pages is just
> > awful.
>
> Actually, I don't know of any usage for this call.
[months later, catching up]
I do. Postgres' could really use something like that for making saner
assumptions about the cost of doing an index/heap scan. postgres doesn't
use mmap() and mmaping larger files into memory isn't all that cheap
(32bit...) so having fincore would be nice.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists