[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A621EB.5080805@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:42:35 -0400
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
CC: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] arm: dts: add bandgap entry for OMAP4460 devices
On 29-05-2013 10:19, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> On 5/29/2013 4:11 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> Salut Monsieur Benoit,
>>
>> On 16-05-2013 08:27, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>> On 16-05-2013 03:20, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>>> Hi Eduardo,
>>>>
>>
>> <cut>
>>
>>>> We need to check.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I also dont think this will work, because we will reparent the
>>> interrupt, setting to a different controller. That will break the TALERT
>>> signal already defined at GIC (check original patch).
>>>
>>> I propose keeping the way I sent. Unless there is a way to set two
>>> different controllers to same device.
>>>
>>
>> Any idea on this patch? Shall we keep the way it is?
>
> Well since we cannot use directly interrupt, I think we need to use at
> least the proper gpio binding.
>
hmm... OK. sounds reasonable. I will change the driver and resend this
one in one single series.
> Thanks,
> Benoit
>
>
>
--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (296 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists