| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 18:50:41 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Feng Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chien Yen <chien.yen@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reuse the same pirq allocated when
driver load first time
On Tue, 21 May 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Looking at the hypervisor code I couldn't see anything obviously wrong.
> >
> > I think the culprit is "physdev_unmap_pirq":
> >
> > if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
> > {
> > spin_lock(&d->event_lock);
> > gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,"d%d, pirq: %d is %x %s, irq: %d\n",
> > d->domain_id, pirq, domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, pirq),
> > domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, pirq) == IRQ_UNBOUND ? "unbound" : "",
> > domain_pirq_to_irq(d, pirq));
> >
> > if ( domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, pirq) != IRQ_UNBOUND )
> > ret = unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq(d, pirq);
> > spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
> > if ( domid == DOMID_SELF || ret )
> > goto free_domain;
> >
> > It always tells me unbound:
> >
> > (XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 54 is ffffffff
> > (XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
> > (XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 53 is ffffffff
> > (XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
> > (XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 52 is ffffffff
> > (XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
> > (XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 51 is ffffffff
> > (XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
> > (XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 50 is ffffffff
> > (XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
> > (a bit older debug code, so the 'unbound' does not show up here).
> >
> > Which means that the call to unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq does not happen.
> > The checks in unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq also look to be depend
> > on the code being IRQ_UNBOUND.
> >
> > In other words, all of that code looks to only clear things when
> > they are !IRQ_UNBOUND.
> >
> > But the other logic (IRQ_UNBOUND) looks to be missing a removal
> > in the radix tree:
> >
> > if ( emuirq != IRQ_PT )
> > radix_tree_delete(&d->arch.hvm_domain.emuirq_pirq, emuirq);
> >
> > And I think that is what is causing the leak - the radix tree
> > needs to be pruned? Or perhaps the allocate_pirq should check
> > the radix tree for IRQ_UNBOUND ones and re-use them?
>
> I think that you are looking in the wrong place.
> The issue is that QEMU doesn't call pt_msi_disable in
> pt_msgctrl_reg_write if (!val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE).
>
> The code above is correct as is because it is trying to handle emulated
> IRQs and MSIs, not real passthrough MSIs. They latter are not added to
> that radix tree, see physdev_hvm_map_pirq and physdev_map_pirq.
This patch fixes the issue, I have only tested MSI (MSI-X completely
untested).
diff --git a/hw/pass-through.c b/hw/pass-through.c
index 304c438..079e465 100644
--- a/hw/pass-through.c
+++ b/hw/pass-through.c
@@ -3866,7 +3866,11 @@ static int pt_msgctrl_reg_write(struct pt_dev *ptdev,
ptdev->msi->flags |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE;
}
else
- ptdev->msi->flags &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE;
+ {
+ if (ptdev->msi->flags & PT_MSI_MAPPED) {
+ pt_msi_disable(ptdev);
+ }
+ }
/* pass through MSI_ENABLE bit when no MSI-INTx translation */
if (!ptdev->msi_trans_en) {
@@ -4013,6 +4017,8 @@ static int pt_msixctrl_reg_write(struct pt_dev *ptdev,
pt_disable_msi_translate(ptdev);
}
pt_msix_update(ptdev);
+ } else if (!(*value & PCI_MSIX_ENABLE) && ptdev->msix->enabled) {
+ pt_msix_delete(ptdev);
}
ptdev->msix->enabled = !!(*value & PCI_MSIX_ENABLE);
diff --git a/hw/pt-msi.c b/hw/pt-msi.c
index b03b989..65fa7d6 100644
--- a/hw/pt-msi.c
+++ b/hw/pt-msi.c
@@ -213,7 +213,8 @@ void pt_msi_disable(struct pt_dev *dev)
out:
/* clear msi info */
- dev->msi->flags &= ~(MSI_FLAG_UNINIT | PT_MSI_MAPPED | PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE);
+ dev->msi->flags &= ~(PT_MSI_MAPPED | PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE);
+ dev->msi->flags |= MSI_FLAG_UNINIT;
dev->msi->pirq = -1;
dev->msi_trans_en = 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists