[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130529180132.GB10845@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:01:32 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
will.deacon@....com, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] xen: move xen_setup_runstate_info and
get_runstate_snapshot to drivers/xen/time.c
> > > > > +void xen_setup_runstate_info(int cpu)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct vcpu_register_runstate_memory_area area;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + area.addr.v = &per_cpu(xen_runstate, cpu);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_register_runstate_memory_area,
> > > > > + cpu, &area))
> > > > > + BUG();
> > > >
> > > > The original code did:
> > > >
> > > > - rc = HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_register_runstate_memory_area, cpu,
> > > > - &area);
> > > > - WARN_ON(rc && rc != -ENOSYS);
> > > > -
> > > > Any reason not to do this?
> > >
> > > The original x86 code just BUGs out: I took that version over the ia64
> > > version.
> >
> > Ah, I see it now. OK, then this looks good to me.
> >
>
> Can I add your acked-by? ;-)
How about?
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists