linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv12 3/4] zswap: add to mm/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130529195027.GC428@cerebellum>
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2013 14:50:27 -0500
From:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
	Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jenifer Hopper <jhopper@...ibm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hugh Dickens <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 3/4] zswap: add to mm/

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 09:57:20 -0500 Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > +/*********************************
> > > > +* helpers
> > > > +**********************************/
> > > > +static inline bool zswap_is_full(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return (totalram_pages * zswap_max_pool_percent / 100 <
> > > > +		zswap_pool_pages);
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > We have had issues in the past where percentage-based tunables were too
> > > coarse on very large machines.  For example, a terabyte machine where 0
> > > bytes is too small and 10GB is too large.
> > 
> > Yes, this is known limitation of the code right now and it is a high priority
> > to come up with something better.  It isn't clear what dynamic sizing policy
> > should be used so, until such time as that policy can be determined, this is a
> > simple stop-gap that works well enough for simple setups.
> 
> It's a module parameter and hence is part of the userspace interface. 
> It's undesirable that the interface be changed, and it would be rather
> dumb to merge it as-is when we *know* that it will be changed.
> 
> I don't think we can remove the parameter altogether (or can we?), so I
> suggest we finalise it ASAP.  Perhaps rename it to
> zswap_max_pool_ratio, with a range 1..999999.  Better ideas needed :(

zswap_max_pool_ratio is fine with me.  I'm not entirely clear on the change
though.  Would that just be a name change or a change in meaning?

Also, we can keep the tunable as I imagine there will always be some use for a
manual override of the (future) dynamic policy.  When the dynamic policy is
available, we can just say that zswap_max_pool_ratio = 0 means "use dynamic
policy" and change the default to 0.  Does that sounds reasonable?

Seth

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/