[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130529155311.9e35e847968f3923bc83f4cd@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 15:53:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Yanovich <ynvich@...il.com>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...terjones.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1302: handle write protection
On Tue, 21 May 2013 03:21:30 +0400 Sergey Yanovich <ynvich@...il.com> wrote:
> This chip has a control register and can prevent altering saved clock.
> Without this patch we could have:
> ----8<----
> (arm)root@...14:~# date
> Tue May 21 03:08:27 MSK 2013
> (arm)root@...14:~# /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh show
> Tue May 21 11:13:58 2013 -0.067322 seconds
> (arm)root@...14:~# /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh stop
> [info] Saving the system clock.
> [info] Hardware Clock updated to Tue May 21 03:09:01 MSK 2013.
> (arm)root@...14:~# /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh show
> Tue May 21 11:14:15 2013 -0.624272 seconds
> ----8<----
>
> ...
>
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1302.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1302.c
> @@ -23,8 +23,12 @@
> #define RTC_CMD_READ 0x81 /* Read command */
> #define RTC_CMD_WRITE 0x80 /* Write command */
>
> +#define RTC_CMD_WRITE_ENABLE 0x00 /* Write enable */
> +#define RTC_CMD_WRITE_DISABLE 0x80 /* Write disable */
> +
> #define RTC_ADDR_RAM0 0x20 /* Address of RAM0 */
> #define RTC_ADDR_TCR 0x08 /* Address of trickle charge register */
> +#define RTC_ADDR_CTRL 0x07 /* Address of control register */
> #define RTC_ADDR_YEAR 0x06 /* Address of year register */
> #define RTC_ADDR_DAY 0x05 /* Address of day of week register */
> #define RTC_ADDR_MON 0x04 /* Address of month register */
> @@ -313,6 +317,7 @@ static int __init ds1302_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(rtc);
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> + ds1302_writebyte(RTC_ADDR_CTRL, RTC_CMD_WRITE_ENABLE);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -321,6 +326,7 @@ static int ds1302_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct rtc_device *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + ds1302_writebyte(RTC_ADDR_CTRL, RTC_CMD_WRITE_DISABLE);
> rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
ds1302_rtc_remove() no longer exists in my tree - it got whittled away
to nothing by
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/rtc-rtc-ds1302-remove-unnecessary-platform_set_drvdata.patch
and
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/drivers-rtc-rtc-ds1302c-remove-empty-function.patch
Perhaps it should be re-added for this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists