[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1369869279-20155-1-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:14:39 -0700
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: sparse: use __aligned() instead of manual padding in mem_section
Instead of leaving a trap for the next person who comes along and wants
to add something to mem_section, add an __aligned() and remove the
manual padding added for MEMCG.
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
Also, does anyone know what causes this alignment to be required here? I found
this was breaking things in a patchset I'm working on (WARNs in sysfs code
about duplicate filenames when initing mem_sections). Adding some documentation
for the reason would be appreciated.
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 131989a..a8e8056 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1125,9 +1125,8 @@ struct mem_section {
* section. (see memcontrol.h/page_cgroup.h about this.)
*/
struct page_cgroup *page_cgroup;
- unsigned long pad;
#endif
-};
+} __aligned(2 * sizeof(unsigned long));
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
#define SECTIONS_PER_ROOT (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof (struct mem_section))
--
1.8.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists