linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] media: davinci: vpif_capture: move the freeing of irq and global variables to remove()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8tQ27Sz7fjS0SACURLbowojp=O24Czuac83LCg-dKzcBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2013 09:44:17 +0530
From:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] media: davinci: vpif_capture: move the freeing of
 irq and global variables to remove()

Hi Laurent,

Thanks for the review.

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Sunday 26 May 2013 17:30:07 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>
>> Ideally the freeing of irq's and the global variables needs to be
>> done in the remove() rather than module_exit(), this patch moves
>> the freeing up of irq's and freeing the memory allocated to channel
>> objects to remove() callback of struct platform_driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c |   31 ++++++++++------------
>>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
>> b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c index caaf4fe..f8b7304
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
>> @@ -2225,17 +2225,29 @@ vpif_int_err:
>>   */
>>  static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
>>  {
>> -     int i;
>> +     struct platform_device *pdev;
>>       struct channel_obj *ch;
>> +     struct resource *res;
>> +     int irq_num, i = 0;
>> +
>> +     pdev = container_of(vpif_dev, struct platform_device, dev);
>
> As Sergei mentioned, the platform device is already passed to the function as
> an argument.
>
OK

>> +     while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i))) {
>> +             for (irq_num = res->start; irq_num <= res->end; irq_num++)
>> +                     free_irq(irq_num,
>> +                              (void *)(&vpif_obj.dev[i]->channel_id));
>
> A quick look at board code shows that each IRQ resource contains a single IRQ.
> The second loop could thus be removed. You could also add another patch to
> perform similar cleanup for the probe code.
>
Any way this will code will be removed in the next patch of the same
series due to usage
of devm_* api. I'll do this change only in the probe code.

Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/