linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: use 'true' instead of '1' for orderly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1369898064.22004.134.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 00:14:24 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	liguang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: use 'true' instead of '1' for
 orderly_poweroff

On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 15:07 +0800, liguang wrote:
> orderly_poweroff is expecting a bool parameter, so
> use 'ture' instead '1'
[]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c
[]
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void rtas_parse_epow_errlog(struct rtas_error_log *log)
>  
>  	case EPOW_SYSTEM_HALT:
>  		pr_emerg("Firmware initiated power off");
> -		orderly_poweroff(1);
> +		orderly_poweroff(ture);
>  		break;

Compile your patches _before_ submitting them please.

"true" not "ture" here and in the commit message.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/