[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369901305.22004.138.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 01:08:25 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: liguang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sys: remove unnecesscary parameter of set_one_prio
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 15:58 +0800, liguang wrote:
[]
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
[]
> -static int set_one_prio(struct task_struct *p, int niceval, int error)
> +static int set_one_prio(struct task_struct *p, int niceval)
Umm, error is forwarded through do_each loops.
Are you sure you can do this without
changing any return code behaviors?
[]
> @@ -211,7 +209,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(setpriority, int, which, int, who, int, niceval)
> else
> pgrp = task_pgrp(current);
> do_each_pid_thread(pgrp, PIDTYPE_PGID, p) {
> - error = set_one_prio(p, niceval, error);
> + error = set_one_prio(p, niceval);
> } while_each_pid_thread(pgrp, PIDTYPE_PGID, p);
> break;
> case PRIO_USER:
> @@ -225,7 +223,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(setpriority, int, which, int, who, int, niceval)
>
> do_each_thread(g, p) {
> if (uid_eq(task_uid(p), uid))
> - error = set_one_prio(p, niceval, error);
> + error = set_one_prio(p, niceval);
> } while_each_thread(g, p);
> if (!uid_eq(uid, cred->uid))
> free_uid(user); /* For find_user() */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists