[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANutaR-e4L+wvfu6Fq7_Q_z9Ynwg8zZcEwzFhH5VxMGfkicYQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 16:15:26 +0800
From: Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: map_init_section flushes incorrect pmd
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>>> Will,
>>> I guess nobody noticed this because the MMU of later v7 processors
>>> fetches page table
>>> from D-cache. It even doesn't need to clean pmd to PoU.
>>
>> It does if it's UP. The walker is only guaranteed to read from L1 if you
>> have the multiprocessing extensions.
>
> Ya, I see.
>>
>> As for this function, looks like it's ok because it has precisely one
>> caller, so it might be worth prefixing it with some underscores to make it
>> clear that nobody else should be calling it!
>
> I am fine with that.
> Should I create a new patch?
Hi,
Does anyone have more comment about this?
Regards,
Po-Yu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists