[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D1610991B866@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:41:42 +0800
From: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
To: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>,
'Will Deacon' <will.deacon@....com>,
'richard -rw- weinberger' <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
CC: "'linux-arch@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: A bug about system call on ARM
Hi Will,
Have you received the log files?
And is there someone looking at this issue now ?
This issue happened on Qcom Scorpoin CPUs,
And it just happened in our stability test occasionally .
If you have some patch for this issue,
I can do the test for it .
Thanks for your help very much !
-----Original Message-----
From: Wang, Yalin
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:51 PM
To: 'Will Deacon'; richard -rw- weinberger
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: RE: A bug about system call on ARM
Hi
This is kernel.log and the stack which is recovered by Trace32 tools.
Please have a look at it .
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@....com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:48 PM
To: richard -rw- weinberger
Cc: Wang, Yalin; linux-arch@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: A bug about system call on ARM
Hello,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:46:42AM +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Wang, Yalin <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com> wrote:
> > I have download the latest linux kernel code 3.9.4 And Compare with
> > 3.4.0 kernel .
> >
> > It seems there is no change for this part , So it will still happen
> > .
> > Does anyone know who is responsible for arm arch part kernel code ?
>
> See MAINTAINERS file.
> CC'ing linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cheers for adding us to CC.
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_THUMB
> >> tst r8, #PSR_T_BIT
> >> movne r10, #0 @ no thumb OABI emulation
> >> ldreq r10, [lr, #-4] @ get SWI instruction // crash at this instruction, when get SWI instruction
Do you have the panic log please? Also, which SoC are you using and how are you reproducing this?
> >> ldr r10, [lr, #-4] @ get SWI instruction
> >> A710( and ip, r10, #0x0f000000 @ check for SWI )
> >> A710( teq ip, #0x0f000000 )
> >> A710( bne .Larm710bug )
> >> #endif
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_BE8
> >> rev r10, r10 @ little endian instruction
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> /******************************************************************
> >> ***
> >> ******************************/
> >>
> >> Then reason why it will crash when get SWI instruction is maybe
> >> This page is clear to aged by kernel, But this MMU fault happpened
> >> in kernel, So the kernel do_page_fault function will not clear this
> >> page to young, So that will crash .
Sounds like we might need some USER annotations around the instruction loads, but we should also rework the code so that we re-enable interrupts first.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists