[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A6B00A.90903@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:48:58 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
CC: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Use do_div() for 64 bit division at power
utilization calculation (putil)
On 05/23/2013 04:34 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Now explicit casting is done when power usage variable (putil) is calculated
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> ---
> This patch was developed on top of the following Alex's repository:
> https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling/commits/power-scheduling
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for catch this issue. seems use div_u64 is better, and there are 2 same bugs.
so, could I rewrite the patch like following?
---
>From 9f72c25607351981898d99822f5a66e0ca67a3da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:09:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched: fix cast on power utilization calculation and use
div_u64
Now explicit casting is done when power usage variable (putil) is
calculated.
div_u64 is optimized on u32.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 09ae48a..3a4917c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1504,8 +1504,8 @@ static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
__update_tg_runnable_avg(&rq->avg, &rq->cfs);
period = rq->avg.runnable_avg_period ? rq->avg.runnable_avg_period : 1;
- rq->util = (u64)(rq->avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_POWER_SHIFT)
- / period;
+ rq->util = div_u64(((u64)rq->avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_POWER_SHIFT),
+ period);
}
/* Add the load generated by se into cfs_rq's child load-average */
@@ -3407,8 +3407,8 @@ static int is_sd_full(struct sched_domain *sd,
/* p maybe a new forked task */
putil = FULL_UTIL;
else
- putil = (u64)(p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_POWER_SHIFT)
- / (p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
+ putil = div_u64(((u64)p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_POWER_SHIFT),
+ p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
/* Try to collect the domain's utilization */
group = sd->groups;
@@ -3463,9 +3463,11 @@ find_leader_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu,
int vacancy, min_vacancy = INT_MAX;
int leader_cpu = -1;
int i;
+
/* percentage of the task's util */
- unsigned putil = (u64)(p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_POWER_SHIFT)
- / (p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
+ unsigned putil;
+ putil = div_u64(((u64)p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_POWER_SHIFT),
+ p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
/* bias toward local cpu */
if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)) &&
--
1.7.12
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists