linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RFC: Set irq thread to RT priority on creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 10:54:41 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Set irq thread to RT priority on creation

On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 16:07 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > This patch solves an issue for me where a device driver is expected to handle an
> > interrupt immediatly after irq handlers are installed and interrupts enabled.
> 
> You miss to explain what kind of issue that is.

I could envision the case where the interrupt is initialized but doesn't
go off until much later. If it never ran, then it would still be in
SCHED_OTHER(), and that first interrupt could have a large delay.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/