linux-kernel - [PATCH 22/66] perf report: Don't bother locking when adding hist entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1369929699-8724-23-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 19:00:55 +0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 22/66] perf report: Don't bother locking when adding hist entries

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>

The 'perf report'command is single-threaded, so no need to grab a lock.

Although the fast path of pthread_mutex_[un]lock() is very fast, there's
a ~3% gain by eliminating it when we have huge sample data.

  $ perf record -a -F 100000 -o perf.data.bench -- perf bench sched all
  $ perf record -e cycles:upp -o perf.data.before -- \
  > perf report -i perf.data.bench --stdio > /dev/null
  ... apply this patch ...
  $ perf record -e cycles:upp -o perf.data.after -- \
  > perf report -i perf.data.bench --stdio > /dev/null
  $ perf diff perf.data.{before,after} | grep pthread
             +0.02%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] _pthread_cleanup_push_defer
             +0.02%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] _pthread_cleanup_pop_restore
     0.05%   -0.05%  perf                [.] pthread_mutex_unlock@plt
     0.05%   -0.05%  perf                [.] pthread_mutex_lock@plt
     1.01%   -1.01%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] pthread_mutex_lock
     1.68%   -1.68%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt
     0.05%   -0.05%  libpthread-2.15.so  [.] pthread_mutex_unlock

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1368497347-9628-6-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 63febd2..0f0cf24 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -312,8 +312,6 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
 	if (rep->cpu_list && !test_bit(sample->cpu, rep->cpu_bitmap))
 		return 0;
 
-	pthread_mutex_lock(&evsel->hists.lock);
-
 	if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
 		ret = perf_report__add_branch_hist_entry(tool, &al, sample,
 							 evsel, machine);
@@ -332,8 +330,6 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
 		if (ret < 0)
 			pr_debug("problem incrementing symbol period, skipping event\n");
 	}
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&evsel->hists.lock);
-
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/