[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130530171225.GA3767@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:42:26 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] dma: Add a jz4740 dmaengine driver
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:25:02PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> This patch adds dmaengine support for the JZ4740 DMA controller. For now the
> driver will be a wrapper around the custom JZ4740 DMA API. Once all users of the
> custom JZ4740 DMA API have been converted to the dmaengine API the custom API
> will be removed and direct hardware access will be added to the dmaengine
> driver.
>
> +
> +#include <asm/mach-jz4740/dma.h>
Am bit worried about having header in arch. Why cant we have this drivers header
in linux/. That way same IP block cna be reused across archs.
I was hoping that you would have move it in 6th patch, but that isnt the case
> +static int jz4740_dma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *c)
> +{
> + struct jz4740_dmaengine_chan *chan = to_jz4740_dma_chan(c);
> +
> + chan->jz_chan = jz4740_dma_request(chan, NULL);
> + if (!chan->jz_chan)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + jz4740_dma_set_complete_cb(chan->jz_chan, jz4740_dma_complete_cb);
> +
> + return 0;
Sorry, I didnt reply on this one. The API expects you to allocate a pool of
descriptors. These descriptors are to be used in .device_prep_xxx calls later.
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists