[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44193648.yaA827Trlv@avalon>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 05:21:57 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Cc: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] media: OF: add sync-on-green endpoint property
Hi Sylwester,
On Saturday 25 May 2013 16:11:52 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 05/25/2013 11:17 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> >> > From looking at Figure 8 "TVP7002 Application Example" in the TVP7002's
> >> > datasheet ([2], p. 52) and your initial TVP7002 patches it looks like
> >> > what you want is to specify polarity of the SOGOUT signal, so the
> >> > processor that receives this signal can properly interpret it, is it
> >> > correct ?
> >
> > Yes
> >
> >> > If so then wouldn't it be more appropriate to define e.g. 'sog-active'
> >> > property and media bus flags:
> >> > V4L2_MBUS_SYNC_ON_GREEN_ACTIVE_LOW
> >> > V4L2_MBUS_SYNC_ON_GREEN_ACTIVE_HIGH
> >> >
> >> > ?
> >
> > Agreed I'll add these flags.
> >
> >> > And for synchronisation method on the analog part we could perhaps
> >> > define 'component-sync' or similar property that would enumerate all
> >> > possible synchronisation methods. We might as well use separate
> >> > boolean properties, but I'm a bit concerned about the increasing
> >> > number of properties that need to be parsed for each parallel video
> >> > bus "endpoint".
> >
> > I am not clear on it can please elaborate more on this.
>
> I thought about two possible options:
>
> 1. single property 'component-sync' or 'video-sync' that would have values:
>
> #define VIDEO_SEPARATE_SYNC 0x01
> #define VIDEO_COMPOSITE_SYNC 0x02
> #define VIDEO_SYNC_ON_COMPOSITE 0x04
> #define VIDEO_SYNC_ON_GREEN 0x08
> #define VIDEO_SYNC_ON_LUMINANCE 0x10
>
> And we could put these definitions into a separate header, e.g.
> <dt-bindings/video-interfaces.h>
>
> Then in a device tree source file one could have, e.g.
>
> video-sync = <VIDEO_SYNC_ON_GREEN>;
>
>
> 2. Separate boolean property for each video sync type, e.g.
>
> "video-composite-sync"
> "video-sync-on-composite"
> "video-sync-on-green"
> "video-sync-on-luminance"
>
> Separate sync, with separate VSYNC, HSYNC lines, would be the default, when
> none of the above is specified and 'vsync-active', 'hsync-active' properties
> are present.
I prefer 1. over 2.
> However, I suppose the better would be to deduce the video synchronisation
> method from the sync signal polarity flags. Then, for instance, when an
> endpoint node contains "composite-sync-active" property the parser would
> determine the "composite sync" synchronisation type is used.
>
> Thus it might make sense to have only following integer properties (added
> as needed):
>
> composite-sync-active
> sync-on-green-active
> sync-on-comp-active
> sync-on-luma-active
>
> This would allow to specify polarity of each signal and at the same time
> the parsing code could derive synchronisation type. A new field could be
> added to struct v4l2_of_parallel_bus, e.g. sync_type and it would be filled
> within v4l2_of_parse_endpoint().
>
> What do you think ?
My gut feeling is that we should have separate properties for the video sync
type and the synchronization signals polarities. We could have a chip that
supports sync-on-green on the analog (input) side and outputs separate hsync
and vsync signals only on the digital (output) side. There would be no sync-
on-green polarity in that case.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists