lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 20:46:39 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] dma: Add a jz4740 dmaengine driver

On 05/30/2013 07:12 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:25:02PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> This patch adds dmaengine support for the JZ4740 DMA controller. For now the
>> driver will be a wrapper around the custom JZ4740 DMA API. Once all users of the
>> custom JZ4740 DMA API have been converted to the dmaengine API the custom API
>> will be removed and direct hardware access will be added to the dmaengine
>> driver.
>>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/mach-jz4740/dma.h>
> Am bit worried about having header in arch. Why cant we have this drivers header
> in linux/. That way same IP block cna be reused across archs.
> I was hoping that you would have move it in 6th patch, but that isnt the case

At the end of this series the header only contains the slave ids used by the
various cores on the JZ4740. Since these ids differ from SoC to SoC it doesn't
make much sense to move the header to a generic location.

> 
> 
>> +static int jz4740_dma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *c)
>> +{
>> +	struct jz4740_dmaengine_chan *chan = to_jz4740_dma_chan(c);
>> +
>> +	chan->jz_chan = jz4740_dma_request(chan, NULL);
>> +	if (!chan->jz_chan)
>> +		return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> +	jz4740_dma_set_complete_cb(chan->jz_chan, jz4740_dma_complete_cb);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
> Sorry, I didnt reply on this one. The API expects you to allocate a pool of
> descriptors. These descriptors are to be used in .device_prep_xxx calls later.

The size of the descriptor is not fixed, so they can not be pre-allocated. And
this is nothing new either, most of the more recently added dmaengine drivers
allocate their descriptors on demand.

- Lars

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ