Message-ID: <CACG0VPXWoD=33rSv9S_C2t7XSHny9vHwKysoiTdwWueQM7MLsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 22:14:14 +0100
From:	Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com>
To:	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network issue on 3.10 rcs, bisected

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Joao Correia
> <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Joao Correia
>>> <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com> wrote:
>>> > Hello list
>>> >
>>> > While trying the rc's for 3.10, i've stumbled upon a problem where
>>> > networking does not work at all. Iptables will show packet counts going up,
>>> > but nothing actually reaches the programs.
>>> >
>>> > I'm running fedora under hyper-v 3 (a windows 2012 host). Only tested ipv4
>>> > traffic, and everything times out (ping, telnet to open ports) on both
>>> > directions. The networking devices come up apparently ok - has static ip
>>> > set, and dmesg shows no errors (although i don't have many debugging options
>>> > enabled).
>>> >
>>> > I bisected this, and git blames commit
>>> > ec5f061564238892005257c83565a0b58ec79295 (net: ill link between CSUM and SG
>>> > features.). I can't revert it cleanly on current rc's.
>>> >
>>> Can you also send network features set on the device?
>>> ethtool -k <dev>
>>
>>
>> As requested:
>> Features for eth0:
>> rx-checksumming: off [fixed]
>> tx-checksumming: off
>>     tx-checksum-ipv4: off [fixed]
>>     tx-checksum-ip-generic: off [fixed]
>>     tx-checksum-ipv6: off [fixed]
>>     tx-checksum-fcoe-crc: off [fixed]
>>     tx-checksum-sctp: off [fixed]
>> scatter-gather: on
>>     tx-scatter-gather: on
>>     tx-scatter-gather-fraglist: off [fixed]
>> tcp-segmentation-offload: off
>>     tx-tcp-segmentation: off [fixed]
>>     tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
>>     tx-tcp6-segmentation: off [fixed]
>> udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed]
>> generic-segmentation-offload: on
>> generic-receive-offload: on
>> large-receive-offload: off [fixed]
>> rx-vlan-offload: off
>> tx-vlan-offload: on
>> ntuple-filters: off [fixed]
>> receive-hashing: off [fixed]
>> highdma: off [fixed]
>> tx-vlan-ctag-hw-insert: on [fixed]
>> rx-vlan-ctag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
>> rx-vlan-ctag-filter: off [fixed]
>> tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed]
>> rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
>> rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed]
>> vlan-challenged: off [fixed]
>> tx-lockless: off [fixed]
>> netns-local: off [fixed]
>> tx-gso-robust: off [fixed]
>> tx-fcoe-segmentation: off [fixed]
>> tx-gre-segmentation: off [fixed]
>> tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed]
>> fcoe-mtu: off [fixed]
>> tx-nocache-copy: off
>> loopback: off [fixed]
>> rx-fcs: off [fixed]
>> rx-all: off [fixed]
>>
>> The output is similar on a working (3.9) and a bad (3.10) kernel.
>> diff-ing both outputs shows:
>> tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed]
>> rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
>> rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed]
>> as last on the broken kernels.
>>
>
> I could not reproduce it, I will try it on VM. Meanwhile can you turn
> off feature "sg" and try same test ?

Hello

Your hint was spot-on. With sg off, i can't reproduce the problem and
networking seems fine. It works fine either way on 3.9, so this is a
regression for 3.10.

Thank you very much for your assistance.
Joao Correia
CIUBI
Universidade da Beira Interior
Portugal

>
> Thanks.
>
>> Thank you for your time,
>> Joao Correia
>> CIUBI
>> Universidade da Beira Interior
>> Portugal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists