[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130530063205.GA5310@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 08:32:05 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
trinity@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, roland@...nel.org,
infinipath@...gic.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Fix RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm unhappy you guys uses offensive word so much. Please cool down all
> you guys. :-/ In fact, _BOTH_ the behavior before and after Cristoph's
> patch doesn't have cleaner semantics.
Erm, this feature _regressed_ after the patch. All other concerns are
secondary. What's so difficult to understand about that?
> And PeterZ proposed make new cleaner one rather than revert. No need to
> hassle.
Sorry, that's not how we deal with regressions upstream...
I've been pretty polite in fact, compared to say Linus - someone should
put a politically correct summary of:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/22/456
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/1113
into Documentation/, people keep forgetting about it.
I'm sorry if being direct and to the point offends you [no, not really],
this discussion got _way_ off the real track it should be on: that this is
a _regression_.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists