[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369985881.10556.54.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:38:01 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] Improving or replacing snd_printk()
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 09:35 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 31 May 2013 00:30:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 09:23 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Fri, 31 May 2013 00:06:07 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:37 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > I think most of snd_printd() and snd_printdd() can be kept as is.
> > > > > These are just debug messages, after all.
> > > > Some of those are emitted at levels other than KERN_DEBUG.
> > > > I think that odd.
> > > Yeah, they aren't good, but it's a different topic.
> >
> > Not really, I think it's systemic and fallout from
> > accretive implementation rather than design.
>
> Maybe.
>
> But you shouldn't mix up with the fix for the missing verbosity and
> the fix for wrong KERN_ prefix, at least, in the patch level. They
> need to be fixed individually.
I think that's best too.
I don't see the complexity/hell in adding functions
for specific types of struct * to reduce the complexity
of the code though. Centralizing those indirections
into functions also generally reduces overall code size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists