[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZnaN=TOB9nZJUS5EPXcCDoMiBvoL47AufDOOcDoH-khg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 14:01:18 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP:
Andy do you consider this a regression that needs to go into fixes?
I.e. is this used in in-tree code and causing problems with v3.10...
I'm asking because it creates a mess as the rest of the series depend
on it.
It is currently applied for v3.11.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists