[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4zaW_y0VCxZzwoK5s-Mv+M9yFXWfWuiMJ_fG9qKqDG3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 20:56:58 +0800
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: srinivas.kandagatla@...com
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux <workgroup.linux@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ARM:prima2: move sirfsoc_of_rstc_init to .init_early
2013/5/31 Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>:
> On 31/05/13 13:24, Barry Song wrote:
>>> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
>> hi Sriniva,
>> i think my "arm: prima2: move to generic reset controller driver
>> framework" fixs this too:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg246206.html
> I did look at the patch, I think it will fix it.
>
> But the patch is still using arch_initcall directly, which means this
> call will be attempted by every SOC in multi_v7 kernel.
> This call can be easily hooked into machine descriptor.
> In that way only prima compatible machines will attempt to call this
> function in first place.
mine should fix panic as it returns 0 instead of using BUG(). but i do
think we should merge yours too to avoid redundant execution path.
>
> Do you know if the second issue of postcore init is fixed in any other
> patches.
no. i will test your v2.
>
> thanks,
> srini
-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists