| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130531143425.GA5850@srcf.ucam.org> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 15:34:25 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, matt.fleming@...el.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 02:43:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > 4) The revert is easy, and the functionality the original patch provided > was a marginal increase in debug output to begin with... I agree that a revert is probably the right thing to do here, but the original patch was there to permit a more accurate calculation of the amount of nvram in use, not to provide additional debug information. Reverting it is going to differently break a different set of systems -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists