[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A8B776.8040701@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 07:45:10 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
joeyli <jlee@...e.com>, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
matt.fleming@...el.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable
info to runtime code
On 05/31/2013 07:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> The only ones that are broken are the Samsung ones. Samsung claims to
> have fixed their UEFI firmware, so we could refer any problems to them.
>
> The signature of the Samsung failure, which this is guarding against is
> that the laptop gets bricked, so it really is a nasty choice of poisons
> we have to pick...
>
Are we sure it is only Samsung? I was under the impression there were
other systems with similar failures?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists