| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130531161504.GA29043@dhcp-192-168-178-175.profitbricks.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 18:15:04 +0200
From: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, tj@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, davem@...emloft.net, mgorman@...e.de,
minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] x86, numa, mem-hotplug: Mark nodes which the
kernel resides in.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:21:17PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> If all the memory ranges in SRAT are hotpluggable, we should not
> arrange them all in ZONE_MOVABLE. Otherwise the kernel won't have
> enough memory to boot.
>
> This patch introduce a global variable kernel_nodemask to mark
> all the nodes the kernel resides in. And no matter if they are
> hotpluggable, we arrange them as un-hotpluggable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 +
> mm/memblock.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index 26d1800..105b092 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -658,6 +658,12 @@ static bool srat_used __initdata;
> */
> static void __init early_x86_numa_init(void)
> {
> + /*
> + * Need to find out which nodes the kernel resides in, and arrange
> + * them as un-hotpluggable when parsing SRAT.
> + */
> + memblock_mark_kernel_nodes();
> +
> if (!numa_off) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
> if (!numa_init(numaq_numa_init))
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index c63a66e..5064eed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
> +void memblock_mark_kernel_nodes(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn,
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 63924ae..1b93a5d 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
> .current_limit = MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE,
> };
>
> +/* Mark which nodes the kernel resides in. */
> +static nodemask_t memblock_kernel_nodemask __initdata_memblock;
> +
> int memblock_debug __initdata_memblock;
> static int memblock_can_resize __initdata_memblock;
> static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
> @@ -787,6 +790,23 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
> memblock_merge_regions(type);
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +void __init_memblock memblock_mark_kernel_nodes()
> +{
> + int i, nid;
> + struct memblock_type *reserved = &memblock.reserved;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < reserved->cnt; i++)
> + if (reserved->regions[i].flags == MEMBLK_FLAGS_DEFAULT) {
> + nid = memblock_get_region_node(&reserved->regions[i]);
> + node_set(nid, memblock_kernel_nodemask);
> + }
> +}
I think there is a problem here because memblock_set_region_node is sometimes
called with nid == MAX_NUMNODES. This means the correct node is not properly
masked in the memblock_kernel_nodemask bitmap.
E.g. in a VM test, memblock_mark_kernel_nodes with extra pr_warn calls iterates
over the following memblocks (ranges below are memblks base-(base+size)):
[ 0.000000] memblock_mark_kernel_nodes nid=64 0x00000000000000-0x00000000010000
[ 0.000000] memblock_mark_kernel_nodes nid=64 0x00000000098000-0x00000000100000
[ 0.000000] memblock_mark_kernel_nodes nid=64 0x00000001000000-0x00000001a5a000
[ 0.000000] memblock_mark_kernel_nodes nid=64 0x00000037000000-0x000000377f8000
where MAX_NUMNODES is 64 because CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=6.
The ranges above belong to node 0, but the node's bit is never marked.
With a buggy bios that marks all memory as hotpluggable, this results in a
panic, because both checks against hotpluggable bit and memblock_kernel_bitmask
(in early_mem_hotplug_init) fail, the numa regions have all been merged together
and memblock_reserve_hotpluggable is called for all memory.
With a correct bios (some part of initial memory is not hotplug-able) the kernel
can boot since the hotpluggable bit check works ok, but extra dimms on node 0
will still be allowed to be in MOVABLE_ZONE.
Actually this behaviour (being able to have MOVABLE memory on nodes with kernel
reserved memblocks) sort of matches the policy I requested in v2 :). But i
suspect that is not your intent i.e. you want memblock_kernel_nodemask_bitmap to
prevent movable reservations for the whole node where kernel has reserved
memblocks.
Is there a way to get accurate nid information for memblocks at early boot? I
suspect pfn_to_nid doesn't work yet at this stage (i got a panic when I
attempted iirc)
I used the hack below but it depends on CONFIG_NUMA, hopefully there is a
cleaner general way:
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index cfd8c2f..af8ad2a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -133,6 +133,19 @@ void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
}
+int __init numa_find_range_nid(u64 start, u64 size)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+ if (start >= mi->blk[i].start && start + size -1 <= mi->blk[i].end)
+ return mi->blk[i].nid;
+ }
+ return -1;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(numa_find_range_nid);
+
static int __init numa_add_memblk_to(int nid, u64 start, u64 end,
bool hotpluggable,
struct numa_meminfo *mi)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 77a71fb..194b7c7 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1600,6 +1600,9 @@ unsigned long change_prot_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+int __init numa_find_range_nid(u64 start, u64 size);
+#endif
struct vm_area_struct *find_extend_vma(struct mm_struct *, unsigned long addr);
int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index a6b7845..284aced 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -834,15 +834,26 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
void __init_memblock memblock_mark_kernel_nodes()
{
- int i, nid;
+ int i, nid, tmpnid;
struct memblock_type *reserved = &memblock.reserved;
for (i = 0; i < reserved->cnt; i++)
if (reserved->regions[i].flags == MEMBLK_FLAGS_DEFAULT) {
nid = memblock_get_region_node(&reserved->regions[i]);
+ if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES) {
+ tmpnid = numa_find_range_nid(reserved->regions[i].base,
+ reserved->regions[i].size);
+ if (tmpnid >= 0)
+ nid = tmpnid;
+ }
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index e862311..84d6e64 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -667,11 +667,7 @@ static bool srat_used __initdata;
*/
static void __init early_x86_numa_init(void)
{
- /*
- * Need to find out which nodes the kernel resides in, and arrange
- * them as un-hotpluggable when parsing SRAT.
- */
- memblock_mark_kernel_nodes();
if (!numa_off) {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
@@ -779,6 +775,12 @@ void __init early_initmem_init(void)
load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);
__flush_tlb_all();
+ /*
+ * Need to find out which nodes the kernel resides in, and arrange
+ * them as un-hotpluggable when parsing SRAT.
+ */
+
+ memblock_mark_kernel_nodes();
early_mem_hotplug_init();
early_memtest(0, max_pfn_mapped<<PAGE_SHIFT);
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists