[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130531233458.GD3345@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 02:34:58 +0300
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
patches@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] drm/nouveau: use mdelay instead of large udelay
constants
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 12:22:40AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we
^^^^
There's l missing here.
> should use mdelay instead for those.
Could this be handled inside ARM udelay() instead? Probably most of the
delay values are compile-time constants.
A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists