linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/4] sched: Make ARM's sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 May 2013 16:50:04 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, arm@...nel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/4] sched: Make ARM's sched_clock generic for all architectures

On 05/31/2013 03:13 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 04/30/2013 05:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Here's the patch to make sched_clock generic. I didn't know
>>> where to put it so I just made a new file in kernel/sched
>>> for now.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> Hey Stephen,
>>      Baruch just asked a question about moving arm's sched_clock.c to
>> be generic, and it sounded familiar, so I dug around and found this
>> mail from a few months ago.
>>
>> Just wanted to follow up and see what the status is with this? Is
>> this queued somewhere already?
>>
> As far as I know nothing has been queued. I refreshed the
> patchset against 3.10-rc2 but haven't sent it out since it wasn't
> clear if anyone wanted it. Shall I send it again?

Please. Even if it need an eventual deeper rework to be totally generic, 
I think we need to start moving things in that generic direction. 
Baruch's case is a clear example where non-arm code could share it, so I 
think that's at least a good proof point that sharing is actually needed 
(rather then just for theoretical reasons).

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/