[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130601184209.GB16790@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 19:42:09 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, ldewangan@...dia.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gg@...mlogic.co.uk,
ian@...mlogic.co.uk, balbi@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:24:37PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Thursday 30 May 2013 05:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:26:33PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>Only compile tested. Just sent a patch to get some comments
> >>/ideas on how to handle such one off regulators.
> >>to handle
> >What's unclear or confusing? This all looks really basic...
> For instance mapping of regulator modes to smps10 modes is unclear.
If you need clarification on that you need to ask a question about it.
There is no question in your code.
> >>+ palmas_smps_read(pmic->palmas, palmas_regs_info[id].ctrl_addr, ®);
> >>+ reg &= ~PALMAS_SMPS10_CTRL_MODE_ACTIVE_MODE_MASK;
> >>+
> >>+ if (mode == REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL)
> >>+ reg |= SMPS10_BOOST_EN;
> >This looks like a switch statement and isn't there an update bits
> >operation?
> There can be multiple modes set at the same time. Having switch
No they can't and if you check your code you'll see that it's correctly
doing that - you're checking if the supplied mode is equal to a given
value...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists